A Nightmare on Elm Street

Audience Reviews

View More

Srgio N @RT03383691 Aug 1 And here we finally check out the last "Pesadelo" (less so at this moment, but we hope it continues like this). 7 years after Craven's attempt to revitalize the franchise, and almost 30 years after the original, a familiar reboot emerges. Despite the more gloomy visual and a more serious plot, the tempos are different and there is no further impact, however disso, or fact of no more or more intrepid terms. Englund also contributes to reduce or interest in the work. Well, it's not exactly ruim (tempers), but it also doesn't have to be a big thing. Okay, curiosity, like everything. May these pérolas rest in peace and may they be revisited from time to time. See more Damien S @Damien197384 Aug 1 A pretty decent remake See more Todor Y @Phantom961 Jul 19 This film, compared to the first one from 1981, is much better made, including the others up until 1994. I didn't particularly like them. Which is strange because I expected more, on the level of Jason Voorhees, but apparently the 80s collection about Freddy Krueger is quite poorly made. Maybe it's because it has special effects like computer animation that the ones from the 80s don't have. But yeah, the first movie from 81s is the only one that's good, and this one too. I must point out that only the 2010 film shows Fred Kruger's story with the fire in detail. The other film I like is Fred vs Jason. See more Charles T @CharlesGaming1000 Jul 14 Welp, this was a shitty remake See more diogo13 T @Tua_mera Jul 12 Não foi tão assustador quanto eu imaginava. See more John K @WQCMI May 14 This should never have been made. It was boring, unmemorable and Jackie Earle Haley looks terrible as Freddy Kruger. Plus I don't like the CGI in this. See more Read all reviews

A Nightmare on Elm Street

My Rating

Read More Read Less WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW POST RATING